Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39959766›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2025

Impact of community public health care on treatment effect, health cognition, and self-management in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Hong Shi, Chun Liu, Hong-Yan Luo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hong ShiDepartment of Infrastructure Operation, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China.
Chun LiuDepartment of Public Health, Minzu Street Community Health Service Center, Wuhan 430000, Hubei Province, China.
Hong-Yan LuoCaotang Community Health Service Center, Chengdu 610031, Sichuan Province, China. 18628365129@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAt present, China has become the country with the largest number of individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM) in the world, with a total of approximately 140 million patients, the majority of whom have type 2 DM (T2DM). Based on conventional nursing methods, community home care has important clinical significance in controlling blood sugar and disease progression.

aimTo explore the impact of community public health nursing on treatment effect, health cognition, and self-management in patients with T2DM.

methodsOne hundred patients with T2DM were selected as the research subjects. The patients were divided into either a conventional nursing group or community nursing (CN) group using the random number table method. The conventional nursing group (50 cases) received routine care, while the CN group (50 cases) received community public health care in addition to routine care as that for the conventional nursing group. The rate of excellent and good blood glucose control, fasting blood glucose before and after care, 2-h postprandial blood glucose, health cognition, and self-management ability, and patient satisfaction were compared between the two groups.

resultsThe CN group had a higher rate of excellent blood sugar control than the conventional nursing group (88%

conclusionCommunity public health care based on conventional care of T2DM can achieve better blood sugar control, and improve patients' health cognitive level and self-management ability.

Indexed as

Blood sugar controlCognition levelCommunity public health careSelf-management abilityType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID39959766
PMCPMC11606368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.