Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39959676›Full record

ArticleActa informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH2024

The Role of Neural Network Analysis in Identifying Predictors of Gastric Cancer.

Ali Abu Siyam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ali Abu SiyamDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, Jadara University, Irbid, Jordan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers. We can use AI for predictive models and help us in early detection and diagnosis. Objective: This study examines the use of a neural network model to classify gastric cancer based on clinical, demographic and genetic data. Methods: The data from the participants were divided into two subsets. 70% training data and 30% testing data. The neural network model has 12 input variables. Factors influencing a disease can be age, sex, family history, smoking, alcohol, Helicobacter pylori infection, food habits, diseases, endoscopic images, biopsy, CT scan, gene variants (TP53, KRAS, CDH1). The hyperbolic tangent activation function has four units in the hidden layer of a model. The output layer used a Softmax activation function and cross-entropy error function which predicted the presence of gastric cancer. The assessment was done on the predictors. Results: The training and testing datasets showed 100% accuracy predicting gastric cancer in the model outputs. Age, gender, family history, infection with Helicobacter pylori, smoking, and drinking alcohol are the biggest predictors. Information from clinical diagnosis like endoscopic images, biopsy and CT scans helped the predictive model. Conclusion: The neural network was able to perform well for gastric cancer predictions using multiple clinical and demographic factors, showing great utility. The outcomes for AI-based diagnostic tools look promising in cancer, however generalization needs to be confirmed using external datasets. The study shows how artificial intelligence can better precision medicine and cancer diagnosis.

Indexed as

Artificial Intelligence in OncologyClinical and Genetic PredictorsGastric Cancer PredictionNeural Network ClassificationPrecision Medicine Tools

Identifiers

PMID39959676
PMCPMC11821569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.