ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025
Intracranial germ cell tumors: advancement in genomic diagnostics and the need for novel therapeutics.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Low-Level Cerebrospinal Fluid β-hCG Elevation in Patients with Pineal Parenchymal Tumors: A Four-Case Series and Diagnostic Caution.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Cerebrospinal Fluid in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology: Molecular Diagnosis, Disease Monitoring, and Clinical Translation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The outcomes for patients with intracranial germ cell tumors (GCT) has improved over the past few decades. However, there remains a lack of a consensus on a standard diagnostic and treatment approach of these tumors. The diagnostic work-up of intracranial GCT remains variable, and the treatment for patients with recurrent disease remains challenging. Methods: We review the current approach in the diagnosis and treatment of intracranial GCT. Given the heterogeneity of these tumors, we highlight the challenges and controversy with these conventional approaches. Results: We discuss the advancements in the understanding of the underlying genetic changes in intracranial GCT and the utility of novel molecular techniques in the diagnosis and classification of intracranial germ cell tumors as well as development of potential novel therapeutics. Discussion: Development of liquid biopsy platforms for diagnosis and management of malignancies is a rapidly growing field. Current approach utilizing traditional tumor markers have significant limitations. In this review, we will discuss profiling of intracranial GCTs for genetic and epigenetic signatures, which are emerging as promising biomarkers to assist in the diagnosis and management of intracranial GCTs. Various studies have shown that activating mutations in MAPK pathway are common alterations in intracranial GCTs, with KIT expression seen in most germinomas. Development of targeted therapeutics against KIT has led to the prospect of targeted therapy in germinoma. Other treatment modalities being considered for clinical development include immunotherapy and the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, especially in NGGCT. In this review, we will discuss the potential novel therapeutics and the clinical trials that are currently under development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.