ArticleDigital health
A model for predicting factors affecting health information avoidance on WeChat.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Latent profile analysis of uncertainty in illness and eating self-efficacy in patients with gastric cancer and its associated factors: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The impact of magnetic resonance imaging anxiety on treatment adherence.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: WeChat serves as a crucial source of health information, distinguished by its highly personalized nature. Avoidance of such personalized health information has a direct impact on individuals' health decision-making. This study aims to identify the factors influencing personalized health information avoidance on WeChat and to construct a hierarchical framework illustrating the relationships among these factors. Methods: A hybrid method was utilized. Semi-structured interviews and grounded theory were used to identify the influencing factors. The interpretive structural modeling (ISM) method was adopted to develop a hierarchical model of the identified factors, followed by matrice d'impacts croises-multiplication appliqué a un classemen (MICMAC) to analyze the dependence and driving power of each factor. Results: The 20 predictors of personalized health information avoidance were broadly categorized into three groups: personal, informational, and social factors. These factors collectively form a three-tier explanatory framework, consisting of the top, middle and bottom layers. At the root layer, health characteristics and cognition exerted a strong driving force, while negative emotions and affective factors at the top layer showed a high degree of dependence. In contrast, the decision-making cognition, informational factors, and social factors in the middle layer exhibited relatively weaker driving force and dependence power. Conclusion: This study bridged the research gap of information avoidance by providing new insights targeting the factors influencing personalized health information avoidance behavior on WeChat. It also contributed to enhancing personal health information management and the health information services provided on WeChat.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.