ArticleSynthetic biology (Oxford, England)2025
Biosensor characterization: formal methods from the perspective of proteome fractions.
Article in Synthetic biology (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering Bacillus subtilis for high-value bioproduction: recent advances and applications.Microbial cell factories · 2025Review
- Harnessing mass spectrometry-based proteomics for continuous directed evolution.Synthetic biology (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many studies characterize transcription factors and other regulatory elements to control gene expression in recombinant systems. However, most lack a formal approach to analyse the inherent and context-specific variations of these regulatory components. This study addresses this gap by establishing a formal framework from which convenient methods are inferred to characterize regulatory circuits. We modelled the bacterial cell as a collection of proteome fractions. Deriving the time-dependent proteome fraction, we obtained a general theorem that describes its change as a function of its expression fraction, a specific portion of the total biosynthesis flux of the cell. Formal deduction reveals that when the proteome fraction reaches a maximum, it becomes equivalent to its expression fraction. This equation enables the reliable measurement of the expression fraction through direct protein quantification. In addition, the experimental data demonstrate a linear correlation between protein production rate and specific growth rate over a significant time period. This suggests a constant expression fraction within this window. For an Isopropyl β- d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) biosensor, in five cellular contexts, expression fractions determined by the maximum method and the slope method produced strikingly similar dose-response parameters when independently fit to a Hill function. Furthermore, by analysing two more biosensors, for mercury and cumate detection, we demonstrate that the slope method can be applied effectively to various systems. Therefore, the concepts presented here provide convenient methods for obtaining dose-response parameters, clearly defining the time interval of their validity and offering a framework for interpreting typical biosensor outputs in terms of bacterial physiology. Graphical Abstract Nutrients, transformed by the action of the Nutrient Fixators (purple arrow), are used at a rate of ρ for Protein biosynthesis. The total rate ρ is multiplied by expression fractions f
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.