ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2024
Is synthetic data generation effective in maintaining clinical biomarkers? Investigating diffusion models across diverse imaging modalities.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- A Multi-Teacher Knowledge Distillation Framework for Enhancing the Robustness of Automated Sperm Morphology Assessment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven diagnosis of acute thoracic aortic dissection: integrating imaging, biomarkers, and clinical workflows-a narrative review.Annals of translational medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The integration of recent technologies in medical imaging has become a cornerstone of modern healthcare, facilitating detailed analysis of internal anatomy and pathology. Traditional methods, however, often grapple with data-sharing restrictions due to privacy concerns. Emerging techniques in artificial intelligence offer innovative solutions to overcome these constraints, with synthetic data generation enabling the creation of realistic medical imaging datasets, but the preservation of critical hidden medical biomarkers is an open question. Methods: This study employs state-of-the-art Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models integrated with a Swin-transformer-based network to generate synthetic medical data. Three distinct areas of medical imaging - radiology, ophthalmology, and histopathology - are explored. The quality of synthetic images is evaluated through a classifier trained to identify the preservation of medical biomarkers. Results: The diffusion model effectively preserves key medical features, such as lung markings and retinal abnormalities, producing synthetic images closely resembling real data. Classifier performance demonstrates the reliability of synthetic data for downstream tasks, with F1 and AUC reaching 0.8-0.99. Discussion: This work provides valuable insights into the potential of diffusion-based models for generating realistic, biomarker-preserving synthetic images across various medical imaging modalities. These findings highlight the potential of synthetic data to address challenges such as data scarcity and privacy concerns in clinical practice, research, and education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.