Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39959533›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgery practice2024

Bone Regrowth After Frontal Burr Hole Craniostomy: Natural History of 14-mm and 20-mm Burr Holes and Implications for Postoperative Trans-Burr Hole Ultrasound.

Albert Antar, Ryan P Lee, Shahab Aldin Sattari, Michael Meggyesy, Jheesoo Ahn, Carly Weber-Levine, Kelly Jiang, Judy Huang, Mark Luciano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgery practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Albert AntarDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3169-8873
Ryan P LeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Shahab Aldin SattariDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Michael MeggyesyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Jheesoo AhnDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Carly Weber-LevineDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Kelly JiangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Judy HuangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Mark LucianoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveBurr hole craniostomy is performed for ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion and endoscopic third ventriculostomy in patients with cerebrospinal fluid disorders. These burr holes are increasingly being used as windows for postoperative ultrasound, an investigational alternative to computed tomography or MRI for follow-up imaging of ventricular caliber. However, bone regrowth reduces ultrasound visibility, and little is known about burr hole regrowth rates in adults. Our study evaluates burr hole regrowth patterns and implications for transcranial ultrasound imaging.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 101 consecutive patients who had frontal burr hole craniostomy for new ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion or endoscopic third ventriculostomy over a 3-year period. A mix of standard 14-mm burr holes and expanded 20-mm burr holes were used. Burr hole bone regrowth was assessed using serial follow-up computed tomography scans. Linear and logistic regression analyses examined if bone regrowth correlated with any clinical variables.

resultsThere was wide variability in rate and degree of burr hole regrowth. The average percentage closure was 25% at 6 months, with minimal additional closure over the following 18 months. The mean residual diameter for 14-mm and 20-mm burr holes stabilized around 9.4 mm and 15.4 mm, respectively. Bone regrowth was not associated with patient characteristics, including age, sex, skull thickness, or etiology of cerebrospinal fluid disorder. Rate of bone regrowth was similar between both cohorts.

conclusionBone regrowth after burr hole craniostomy is common, even in elderly patients, occurring rapidly within the first 6 to 12 months and subsequently stabilizing. It is frequently severe enough to restrict ultrasound visualization. Regrowth could not be predicted with any investigated variables, so uniform techniques are needed to block regrowth to allow for longitudinal ultrasound imaging, such as full-thickness cylindrical burr hole implants.

Indexed as

Bone regrowthCranioplastyImagingSonolucentUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID39959533
PMCPMC11810037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.