ArticleHealth psychology and behavioral medicine2025
Dataset for a qualitative interview study exploring the barriers and facilitators to using and recommending aspirin for cancer prevention.
Article in Health psychology and behavioral medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dataset for a qualitative interview study exploring the barriers and facilitators to using and recommending aspirin for cancer prevention.Health psychology and behavioral medicine · 2025Article
- Moving towards openness: introduction to the registered reports and data notes article collection.Health psychology and behavioral medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Aspirin is increasingly recommended for colorectal cancer prevention for people with Lynch syndrome, who are at higher risk. Before starting aspirin, patients should be reviewed by a healthcare professional for contraindications. We conducted interviews to explore the views of people with Lynch syndrome and healthcare professionals on aspirin for cancer prevention. While open data sharing is increasingly implemented for quantitative research, it is less likely to be adopted for qualitative data. We aimed to create and share a qualitative dataset of the interview transcripts in a restricted access repository. Methods: We interviewed 15 people with Lynch syndrome and 23 healthcare professionals. Healthcare professionals included general practitioners (GPs), community pharmacists, genetic counsellors, and specialist hospital clinicians (e.g. genetics, gastroenterology). The interview schedule was informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework. Interviews were conducted over video or telephone. Results: Participants could consent to their anonymised interview transcript being deposited in a restricted repository, with access limited to people using the data for non-commercial research, learning or teaching purposes. Those who did not consent could still participate in the interview. Several transcripts were removed due to identifiability concerns. In total, we deposited 12 transcripts with people with Lynch syndrome, and 8 transcripts with GPs. Discussion: To safeguard participants' identities, we fully anonymised the dataset. While this acted to protect participants' identities, it also potentially reduced its usability due to the removal of rich contextual detail. When sharing qualitative data, it is important to balance confidentiality with data reusability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.