Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39959416›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of sports physical therapy2025

Clinical Evolution and Safety of a Cryotherapy - Based Spray for Mild to Moderate Joint and Muscle Pain: A Descriptive Observational Study.

Manuel A Ballester Herrera, Josep M Muñoz Vives, Agusti Marti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of sports physical therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Manuel A Ballester HerreraCentro Médico Quirón Santa Pola.
Josep M Muñoz VivesTraumatology Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa - Fundació Althaia.
Agusti MartiMedical Department Greenhouse Data Science S L.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cryotherapy, long used for its pain-relieving and anti-inflammatory effects, is widely applied in sports medicine, physiotherapy, and postoperative care. Advances in cryotherapy methods, including the use of topical vapocoolant sprays, offer enhanced pain management and support recovery from musculoskeletal injuries by alleviating pain and reducing swelling in a targeted manner. Hypothesis/Purpose: The primary aim was to assess both immediate and sustained pain relief in subjects with mild to moderate musculoskeletal complaints. Study Design: Observational cohort study. Methods: Fifty-nine participants with mild to moderate musculoskeletal pain participated in a three-week observational study evaluating a cryotherapy spray. Pain and range of motion (ROM) were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and goniometer measurements at multiple time points, including T-1 (before treatment), T0 (beginning of treatment), T2-min, T5-min, T10-min, T15-min, T30-min, T60-min, T7-days, T14-days, while participants were actively receiving treatment exclusively with the cryotherapy spray, and T21-days (1 week after treatment cessation). Acceptability Test and additional subjective questionnaires evaluated participants analysis of cooling sensation and product tolerance. Data were analyzed using Cumulative Logit Mixed Models (CLMM) and the non-parametric Friedman test for repeated measures. Results: The cryotherapy spray significantly reduced pain (VAS) from baseline (p < 0.001, Hedges' g = -1.90) and improved joint mobility (ROM) with derived scores increasing from 3 (3-4) to 4 (4-4) by Day 21 (p < 0.001). Rapid pain relief was reported by 35% of participants within 10 seconds, with 80% experiencing relief within three minutes. Comfort ratings were consistently high, with 95% of participants expressing satisfaction at Day 0, rising to 99% by Day 14. Global efficacy satisfaction measured by a subjective Likert scale also increased from 75% at baseline to 95% by Day 14. No adverse events were reported. Conclusion: This study supports the effectiveness of the cryotherapy spray in reducing pain and improving joint mobility, with both immediate and sustained benefits. High patient satisfaction and a favorable safety profile suggest its potential for clinical use. Further controlled studies could confirm its efficacy in broader populations. Level of Evidence: Level 3.

Indexed as

CryotherapyJoint MobilityMusculoskeletal PainPain ManagementPatient SatisfactionTopical Analgesic

Identifiers

PMID39959416
PMCPMC11830277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.