ArticleIJTLD open2025
Patient pathway analysis of rifampicin-resistant TB diagnostic and treatment delays.
Article in IJTLD open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic and treatment delays and associated factors among RR-TB patients under molecular drug susceptibility testing: a retrospective study in Guizhou Province, China.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Prevalence, Progression, and Treatment of Asymptomatic Tuberculosis: A Prospective Cohort Study in Lanxi County, Zhejiang Province, China.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBarriers to the diagnosis and treatment of rifampicin-resistant TB (RR-TB) have not been fully elucidated. This study aimed to map the diagnostic and treatment delays among patients with RR-TB in China and investigate related factors.
methodsBetween June and July 2023, the diagnostic and treatment pathways of patients with RR-TB were obtained through interviews at eight hospitals across China. Information on the TB service of hospitals was collected via telephone.
resultsNinety-eight patients were included. On average, each patient required 4.6 visits to start RR-TB treatment. The median delay from illness onset to RR-TB treatment was 238.0 days (IQR 85.8-469.2), primarily driven by the delay between TB diagnosis and identifying rifampicin (RIF) resistance (median: 43.5 days, IQR 3.0-160.5). Referral to appropriate hospitals (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.32; 95% CI 1.37-3.92) or considering drug susceptibility testing (DST) when initiating treatment (aHR 2.56, 95% CI 1.39-4.72) significantly reduced delay between TB diagnosis and identifying RIF resistance, while stigma regarding TB (aHR 0.61, 95% CI 0.38-0.98) was an independent risk factor.
conclusionsPatients with RR-TB experienced substantial delays in identifying RIF resistance. Referring patients to hospitals with molecular DST capabilities and awareness may reduce these delays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.