ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Recognition and localization of ratoon rice rolled stubble rows based on monocular vision and model fusion.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Ratoon rice, as a high-efficiency rice cultivation mode, is widely applied around the world. Mechanical righting of rolled rice stubble can significantly improve yield in regeneration season, but lack of automation has become an important factor restricting its further promotion. Methods: In order to realize automatic navigation of the righting machine, a method of fusing an instance segmentation model and a monocular depth prediction model was used to realize monocular localization of the rolled rice stubble rows in this study. Results: To achieve monocular depth prediction, a depth estimation model was trained on training set we made, and absolute relative error of trained model on validation set was only 7.2%. To address the problem of degradation of model's performance when migrated to other monocular cameras, based on the law of the input image's influence on model's output results, two optimization methods of adjusting inputs and outputs were used that decreased the absolute relative error from 91.9% to 8.8%. After that, we carried out model fusion experiments, which showed that CD (chamfer distance) between predicted 3D coordinates of navigation points obtained by fusing the results of the two models and labels was only 0.0990. The CD between predicted point cloud of rolled rice stubble rows and label was only 0.0174.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.