Trial reportActa clinica Croatica2024
COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF BREAST MILK, DRY-KEEPING, AND USE OF CHLORHEXIDINE IN UMBILICAL CORD CARE.
Trial report in Acta clinica Croatica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Umbilical cord antiseptics for preventing sepsis and death among newborns.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research was conducted as a randomized study with the objective of determining the effects of breast milk, dry-keeping, and chlorhexidine methods used in umbilical cord care on the time of umbilical cord separation and on omphalitis and bacterial flora development. The study was carried out in 97 newborns divided into three groups, as follows: breast milk was used for umbilical cord care in group 1 of 32 newborns, dry-keeping was applied in group 2 of 35 newborns, and chlorhexidine was applied in group 3 of 30 newborns. Infants were assigned to three subgroups through randomization performed using a computer program. Swabs for culture were obtained from umbilical cord on postnatal day 2 and day 5. While difference in the results of the care methods applied was not significant on day 2, significant difference in the results was found on day 5. It was determined that there was no bacterial growth in 46.7% of the chlorhexidine group, while maximum bacterial growth was recorded in the dry-keeping group. In the chlorhexidine group, timing of umbilical cord separation was significantly shorter than in other groups. Study results indicated that the most effective method was the use of chlorhexidine. Dry-keeping can be risky since it was inefficient in preventing umbilical colonization, and in cases where the cost of chlorhexidine is an issue, the use of breast milk can be recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.