Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39959307›Full record

ArticleClinical interventions in aging2025

Assessing Sedation Depth with PSI in Elderly ERCP Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Lei Huang, Lin-Lin Liu, Yong-da Lu, Min-Yuan Zhuang, Wei Dou, Hong Liu, Fu-Hai Ji, Ke Peng

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07339449 (Intraoperative Multimodal Monitoring as a Means in Reducing the Duration of Mechanical Ventilation in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Procedures - A Pilot Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07339449 narecruitingnot on this map

Intraoperative Multimodal Monitoring as a Means in Reducing the Duration of Mechanical Ventilation in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Procedures - A Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital DubravaRan2025 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsMajor Abdominal Surgeries, Mechanical VentilationArmsMultimodal monitoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lei Huang *Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-4400-4751
Lin-Lin Liu *Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Yong-da Lu *Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Min-Yuan ZhuangDepartment of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Wei DouDepartment of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Hong LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3611-7131
Fu-Hai JiDepartment of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-6649-665X
Ke PengDepartment of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-2879-1759

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Adequate sedation is important for elderly patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Patient state index (PSI) via the SedLine® system has been utilized for real-time monitoring of anesthesia depth in surgical patients. We aimed to assess the correlation between PSI and Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) scores in elderly patients undergoing ERCP. Methods: This prospective cohort study included 57 elderly patients scheduled for ERCP procedures. Patients received target-controlled infusion of propofol, titrated to the sedation level of MOAA/S scores of 1 and 2. The MOAA/S scores and PSI values were recorded during sedation and recovery. We also documented procedure and recovery time, oversedation (PSI < 25 for at least 10 min and EEG burst suppression), adverse events, and fatigue scores (0-10, higher scores indicating more fatigue). Results: All patients completed this study (mean age of 73 years and 63% male), with a mean procedure time of 53 min and recovery time of 37 min. Five patients (8.8%) experienced PSI < 25 for at least 10 min, and three of them (5.3%) showed EEG burst suppression. No patients developed desaturation or intra-procedural awareness. Hypotension and abdominal pain were uncommon. Nine patients (15.8%) experienced mild dizziness or nausea. The median (IQR) fatigue score was 3 (2-4) at recovery room discharge. A significant correlation was observed between the MOAA/S scores and PSI values (Spearman correlation coefficient Conclusion: PSI provides a useful and real-time monitoring of sedation for elderly patients undergoing ERCP. Our results showed a significant correlation between the PSI values and MOAA/S scores and suggested a PSI value of 50 with a range of 48 to 52 for maintaining adequate sedation. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2400079859).

Indexed as

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeHypnotics and SedativesProcedural SedationPropofolAgedAged, 80 and overAnesthesia Recovery PeriodFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesHypnotics and SedativesPropofoldepth of sedationelderly patientsendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyModified Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedationpatient state index

Identifiers

PMID39959307
PMCPMC11829650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.