Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39959302›Full record

ArticleBio-protocol2025

Versatile Click Chemistry-based Approaches to Illuminate DNA and RNA G-Quadruplexes in Human Cells.

Angélique Pipier, David Monchaud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bio-protocol, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Angélique PipierInstitut de Chimie Moléculaire de l'Université de Bourgogne (ICMUB), CNRS UMR6302, Dijon, France.
David MonchaudInstitut de Chimie Moléculaire de l'Université de Bourgogne (ICMUB), CNRS UMR6302, Dijon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The existence and functional relevance of DNA and RNA G-quadruplexes (G4s) in human cells is now beyond debate, but how did we reach such a level of confidence? Thanks to a panoply of molecular tools and techniques that are now routinely implemented in wet labs. Among them, G4 imaging ranks high because of its reliability and practical convenience, which now makes cellular G4 detection quick and easy; also, because this technique is sensitive and responsive to any G4 modulations in cells, which thus allows gaining precious insights into G4 biology. Herein, we briefly explain what a G4 is and how they can be visualized in human cells; then, we present the strategy we have been developing for several years now for in situ click G4 imaging, which relies on the use of biomimetic G4 ligands referred to as TASQs (for template-assembled synthetic G-quartets) and is far more straightforward and modular than classically used immunodetection methods. We thus show why and how to illuminate G4s with TASQs and provide a detailed, step-by-step methodology (including the preparation of the materials, the methodology per se, and a series of notes to address any possible pitfalls that may arise during the experiments) to make G4 imaging ever easier to operate. Key features • MultiTASQs are clickable probes usable for the detection of cellular DNA and RNA G-quadruplex (G4). • In situ click chemistry relies on the labeling of G4 by clickable probes once in their cellular binding sites. • Experiments can be performed by incubating the clickable probe either in live cells or in fixed cells. • The published but unoptimized protocol is now totally revised to allow for reliable G4 detection in human cells.

Indexed as

Clickable MultiTASQsClick chemistryDNA/RNA G-quadruplex (G4)Optical imagingTemplate-assembled synthetic G-quartets (TASQs)

Identifiers

PMID39959302
PMCPMC11825307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.