ArticleBio-protocol2025
An Effective and Safe Maize Seed Chipping Protocol Using Clipping Pliers With Applications in Small-Scale Genotyping and Marker-Assisted Breeding.
Article in Bio-protocol, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recessive antimorph alleles reveal novel functions of the Opaque1 myosin XI in maize.Plant physiology · 2026Article
- Omics-driven plant breeding through phenomics-enviromics crosstalk.Nature communications · 2026Review
- Big data and artificial intelligence-aided crop breeding: Progress and prospects.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In applications such as marker-assisted breeding and positional cloning, tissue sampling and plant tracking are vital steps in the genotyping pipeline. They enable the identification of desirable seedlings, saving time and reducing the cost, space, and handling required for growing adult plants, especially for greenhouses and winter nurseries. Small-scale marker-assisted selection laboratories rely heavily on leaf-based genotyping, which involves over-planting large, segregating populations followed by leaf sampling, genotyping, and backtracking to identify desired individuals, which is costly and laborious. Thus, there is a need to adopt seed-based genotyping to reduce costs and save time. Therefore, we developed a safe and cheap seed-chipping protocol using clipping pliers to chip seeds to genotype before planting. To identify a cost-effective and high-throughput DNA extraction method, we tested four extraction methods and assessed the quality of the seed DNA using PCR. For three of the methods, seed-based DNA was of comparable quality to DNA extracted from leaf punches. We also compared seed- and leaf-derived DNA from the same individuals in a segregating population to test for genotyping miscalls that could arise due to the presence of maternally derived pericarp in the seed samples. Out of 43 potential instances, we found zero miscalled samples and, therefore, no evidence supporting consequential pericarp inclusion. Germination rates of chipped and unchipped seeds were the same for the inbreds tested, B73 and Mo17. However, chipped seeds grew slower until ~14 days after sowing. Overall, seed sampling using clipping pliers provides a simple, reliable, and high-throughput method to identify specific genotypes before planting. Key features • Provides a quick, safe, and cheap sampling technique for maize kernels that may also be suitable for other plants with relatively large seeds. • Includes procedures and materials to track and organize samples within and across batches involving tens to thousands of seeds. • Seeds can be sampled and genotyped relatively quickly for planting; in one day, 384 seeds can be sampled, processed for DNA, and genotyped by PCR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.