ArticleBio-protocol2025
Optimal Dual RNA-Seq Mapping for Accurate Pathogen Detection in Complex Eukaryotic Hosts.
Article in Bio-protocol, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dual RNA-Seq technology has significantly advanced the study of biological interactions between two organisms by allowing parallel transcriptomic analysis. Existing analysis methods employ various combinations of open-source bioinformatics tools to process dual RNA-Seq data. Upon reviewing these methods, we intend to explore crucial criteria for selecting standard tools and methods, especially focusing on critical steps such as trimming and mapping reads to the reference genome. In order to validate the different combinatorial approaches, we performed benchmarking using top-ranking tools and a publicly available dual RNA-Seq Sequence Read Archive (SRA) dataset. An important observation while evaluating the mapping approach is that when the adapter trimmed reads are first mapped to the pathogen genome, more reads align to the pathogen genome than the unmapped reads derived from the traditional host-first mapping approach. This mapping method prevents the misalignment of pathogen reads to the host genome due to their shorter length. In this way, the pathogenic read information found at lesser proportions in a complex eukaryotic dataset is precisely obtained. This protocol presents a comprehensive comparison of these possible approaches, resulting in a robust unified standard methodology. Key features • Benchmarking of top-ranking software for quality control, adapter trimming, and read mapping. • Emphasizes the importance of read mapping criteria for dual RNA-Seq datasets: (i) high count of uniquely host mapped reads, (ii) low count of host multi-mapped reads, and (iii) high count of unmapped reads belonging to pathogens. • Elaborates the best mapping approach to precisely extract the pathogen reads as these get captured comparatively less in dual RNA-Seq datasets. Graphical overview.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.