Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39959288›Full record

ArticleBio-protocol2025

Rapid Sampling of Large Quantities of Interstitial Fluid from Human Skin Using Microneedles and a Vacuum-assisted Skin Patch.

Elizabeth C Wilkirson, Xue Jiang, Peter B Lillehoj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bio-protocol, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elizabeth C WilkirsonDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA.
Xue JiangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA.
Peter B LillehojDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interstitial fluid (ISF) is a promising diagnostic sample due to its extensive biomolecular content while being safer and less invasive to collect than blood. However, existing ISF sampling methods are time-consuming, require specialized equipment, and yield small amounts of fluid (<5 μL). We have recently reported a simple and minimally invasive technique for rapidly sampling larger quantities of dermal ISF using a microneedle (MN) array to generate micropores in the skin from which ISF is extracted using a vacuum-assisted skin patch. Here, we present step-by-step protocols for fabricating the MN array and skin patch, as well as for using them to sample ISF from human skin. Using this technique, an average of 20.8 μL of dermal ISF can be collected within 25 min, which is a ∼6-fold improvement over existing ISF sampling methods. Furthermore, the technique is well-tolerated and does not require the use of expensive or specialized equipment. The ability to collect ample volumes of ISF in a quick and minimally invasive manner will facilitate the analysis of ISF for biomarker discovery and its use for diagnostic testing. Key features • Minimally invasive (bloodless and nearly painless) technique for sampling ISF from human skin. • An average of 20.8 μL of interstitial fluid can be collected within 25 min. • This technique does not require expensive or specialized equipment or electricity. • Collected ISF can be analyzed using conventional laboratory-based assays or point-of-care diagnostic tests.

Indexed as

BiomarkerDermalInterstitial fluidMicroneedleSkin

Identifiers

PMID39959288
PMCPMC11825300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.