Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39959255›Full record

ArticleAEM education and training2025

Fundamentals of telehealth: A learning compendium for residents.

Lulu Wang, Shruti Chandra, Christopher J Nash, Anthony Tony Fabiano, Peter C Hou, David C Whitehead, Alexander Kolkin, Milos Tomovic, Emily M Hayden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AEM education and training, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lulu WangDepartment of Emergency Medicine MedStar Health/Georgetown University Washington DC USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9556-6108
Shruti ChandraDepartment of Emergency Medicine Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0294-9397
Christopher J NashDepartment of Emergency Medicine Duke University Hospital Durham North Carolina USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0738-409X
Anthony Tony FabianoDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Cincinnati Cincinnati Ohio USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8795-3980
Peter C HouDivision of Emergency Critical Care Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA.
David C WhiteheadDepartment of Emergency Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA.
Alexander KolkinDepartment of Emergency Medicine MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington DC USA.
Milos TomovicNYU Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine New York New York USA.
Emily M HaydenDepartment of Emergency Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2660-8658

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Telehealth is an integral part of modern care delivery. Accordingly, accrediting bodies have recognized the importance of telehealth in trainee education. In 2021, the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) published a report identifying telehealth learner core competencies in six domains: patient safety and appropriate use, access and equity, communication, data collection and assessment, ethical practices and legal requirements, and technology for telehealth. We present here a Fundamentals of Telehealth Resource Compendium for residents that fulfills these competencies. Methods: The compendium was curated by a group of telehealth subject matter experts from the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) Telehealth Interest Group, through a structured iterative process. Authors performed a literature review for open-source telehealth educational resources. Each resource was rated for quality by two reviewers using the rMETRIQ score (Revised Medical Education Translational Resources: Impact and Quality). Resources with the highest composite rMETRIQ reviewer score were included in the final collection. Results: Scores for resources ranged from 2 to 21 (with a maximum possible rMETRIQ score of 21). Of 201 resources reviewed and rated, 57 were included in the final collection. A Fundamentals of Telehealth section was added as an introduction (five resources)-these resources did not undergo the rMETRIQ scoring process. Conclusions: This telehealth compendium is a resource from which residency programs can further tailor site-specific training. Alternatively, an individual can use this compendium as a self-study tool to gain a basic understanding of telehealth and its intersection with emergency medicine. Note that while this compendium is designed for the resident-level learner, it is easily adaptable to a learner of any level, as many underlying concepts remain the same.

Indexed as

telehealthtelehealth competenciestelehealth education

Identifiers

PMID39959255
PMCPMC11828698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.