ArticleAEM education and training2025
Factors associated with performance on the emergency medicine qualifying examination.
Article in AEM education and training, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Declining Performance on the Qualifying Examination: Modeling of a Potential Inflection Point in Emergency Medicine.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026Article
- Factors associated with performance on the emergency medicine qualifying examination.AEM education and training · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Board certification standards exceed the baseline requirements for state licensure, assuring the public that specialists demonstrate additional clinical skills, knowledge, and professional behavior to provide safe and high-quality specialty care. The objective of this study was to determine what physician factors (e.g., gender, age, race/ethnicity, medical school training, and other factors) were associated with the American Board of Emergency Medicine qualifying examination (QE) performance and pass rates. Methods: This was a national retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study exploring factors associated with the QE. Subjects were physicians who graduated from accredited emergency medicine (EM) categorical residency programs who took the QE for the first time in 2017, 2018, or 2019. A series of multilevel models was used to examine if physician characteristics were related to score and passing the QE. Relative risks were calculated. Results: There were 6174 EM graduates, 2118 of whom were women and 588 who were underrepresented in medicine (URiM) physicians. Controlling for other variables, in-training examination (ITE) scores and medical doctor (MD) degrees were positively related to mean QE scores, whereas age, 3-year programs, URiM, and male gender were negatively related to mean QE scores. The QE pass rate was 94%, 95% for non-URiM and 86% for URiM. Results of the full model indicated ITE score, age, URiM, gender, MD degree, and residency program format were significantly related to performance on the QE. In the final model, passing the QE was positively related to ITE scores and negatively related to age and URiM. After other variables were controlled for, the adjusted risk ratio for URiM was 0.94. Conclusions: Several factors were associated with decreased pass rates on the ABEM QE including ITE scores, older age, and URiM, although the risk ratios were small.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.