ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2025
Effect of aerobic exercise combined with systematic nursing on psychological status and pregnancy outcomes in patients with gestational hypertension.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Structured exercise interventions for women at high risk of or diagnosed with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a scoping review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Pooled it
- The metabolic implications of maternal exercise: effects on pregnant women and their offspring.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the effectiveness of aerobic exercise combined with systematic nursing care on the psychological well-being and pregnancy outcomes of patients with gestational hypertension.
methodsA study was conducted on 200 patients with gestational hypertension treated from May 2023 to May 2024. Patients were assigned to an observation group (n=110), which received aerobic exercise and systematic nursing care, or a control group (n=90), which received standard care. Both groups were monitored until delivery. Pre- and post-intervention comparisons included scores for negative emotions, blood pressure, pregnancy outcomes, neonatal weight, Apgar scores, delivery methods, and patient satisfaction with nursing care. The systolic-to-diastolic peak (S/D) ratio in umbilical blood flow and heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) levels were analyzed, with ROC analysis used to evaluate their predictive value for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Logistic regression was employed to identify independent risk factors for low Apgar scores in neonates.
resultsFollowing the intervention, the observation group showed significantly better blood pressure control and greater reductions in negative emotions compared to the control group (both P<0.05). The incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes was significantly lower, and the rate of vaginal delivery was higher in the observation group (both P<0.05). Patients with adverse outcomes had significantly elevated S/D ratios and serum HSP70 levels (both P<0.05). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for predicting pregnancy outcomes was 0.733 for the S/D ratio, 0.817 for HSP70, and 0.916 when combined, indicating strong predictive value. Neonates in the observation group had higher birth weights and Apgar scores (both P<0.05). Patient satisfaction with nursing care was also significantly higher in the observation group (P<0.05).
conclusionCombining aerobic exercise with systematic nursing care is effective in improving psychological health, pregnancy outcomes, quality of life, and patient satisfaction in patients with gestational hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.