ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2025
Efficiency of evidence-based collaborative nursing on complications, negative emotions and quality of live in radical prostatectomy.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Social representations of radical prostatectomy from the perspective of men undergoing surgery.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of evidence-based collaborative nursing in reducing complications, alleviating negative emotions, and improving the quality of life in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.
methodsIn this retrospective study, Sixty-three patients who underwent surgery for prostate cancer between September 2021 and August 2022 were included as the control group, while 75 patients hospitalized between September 2022 and August 2023 were selected as the observation group. All these patients were treated at Tianjin Medical University General Hospital. The control group received routine nursing care, while the observation group received evidence-based collaborative nursing in addition to standard care. Complications, emotional state, self-care ability, fear of disease progression, quality of life, urodynamic index and the satisfaction with care were compared and analyzed between the two groups.
resultsThe observation group experienced significantly fewer complications than the control group (
conclusionEvidence-based collaborative caring significantly improves emotional well-being, enhances self-care ability and quality of life, and reduces postoperative complications in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. This approach holds great potential for broader clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.