ArticleRheumatology advances in practice2025
Effectiveness of baricitinib versus sarilumab on disease activity in patients with RA: a propensity score matching study.
Article in Rheumatology advances in practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the effects of baricitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, versus sarilumab, a human monoclonal antibody against the IL-6 receptor, on the disease activity of patients with RA. Methods: At our hospital and cooperative facilities, we initiated treatment with baricitinib and sarilumab and observed patients with RA longitudinally for 52 weeks. Propensity score matching (age, sex, disease duration, MTX/glucocorticoid usage, RF/ACPA positivity and Disease Activity Score 28 with CRP level) was performed to address potential treatment selection bias, resulting in 46 patients in each group. The following data were collected: Disease Activity Score 28 with CRP, Clinical Disease Activity Index, Simplified Disease Activity Index, Boolean 2.0 and their component indices at weeks 24 and 52. A comparative analysis was conducted between the two groups. Results: Compared with baricitinib, sarilumab induced a similar improvement in disease activity; however, baricitinib induced a significantly greater improvement in the Clinical Disease Activity Index at 24 weeks than sarilumab. At the component level, baricitinib significantly improved the number of swollen joints at 24 weeks, improving the Clinical Disease Activity Index; however, after 52 weeks, the difference between the two groups was no longer statistically significant. Conclusion: Compared with sarilumab, baricitinib improved swollen joints and the Clinical Disease Activity Index at 24 weeks; however, by 52 weeks, no significant difference was observed between the two groups, indicating that both treatments are important for long-term use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.