Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39959116›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

Brownian Dynamics Simulation of Microscale Thermophoresis in Liquid.

Koki Ide, Tetsuro Tsuji, Takayuki Suzuki, Kenji Setoura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Koki IdeAdvanced Course of Mechanical System Engineering, Kobe City College of Technology, Kobe, Hyogo 651-2194, Japan.
Tetsuro TsujiGraduate School of Informatics, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2087-5459
Takayuki SuzukiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Kobe City College of Technology, Kobe, Hyogo 651-2194, Japan.
Kenji SetouraDepartment of Electrical Materials and Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, University of Hyogo, Himeji, Hyogo 671-2280, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4610-7407

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microscale thermophoresis (MST) has garnered significant attention as a manipulation method for chemical species ranging from nanometers to micrometers in liquids. In particular, techniques for manipulating single nanometer-sized objects have been developed by driving MST through laser heating with near-infrared wavelengths focused down to submicron scales or via photothermal conversion of plasmonic nanoparticles. While MST simulations on a macroscopic scale can be addressed by solving the diffusion equation using the finite element method, alternative computational approaches are required to investigate thermophoretic behavior at the single-particle level. For this purpose, we have developed a numerical method for the thermophoresis of individual nanoparticles diffusing in a liquid by combining the finite element method for steady-state heat conduction with Brownian dynamics simulations. The scripts for the finite element method and Brownian dynamics calculations used in the present simulations are uploaded in the Supporting Information and freely available. The numerical results demonstrated satisfactory agreement with the experimental results of laser-induced thermophoresis performed on polystyrene nanoparticles with a diameter of 500 nm in water. This computational method is highly useful for controlling MST at the single-particle level, enabling the design of spatial temperature distributions and the evaluation of thermophoretic forces acting on individual nanoparticles.

Identifiers

PMID39959116
PMCPMC11822484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.