Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39959102›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

Efficient and Explainable Virtual Screening of Molecules through Fingerprint-Generating Networks Integrated with Artificial Neural Networks.

Rivaaj Monsia, Sudeep Bhattacharyya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rivaaj MonsiaDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Eau Claire, Wisconsin 54701, United States.
Sudeep BhattacharyyaDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Eau Claire, Wisconsin 54701, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3960-1239

Funding

Exploring the Dynamics of Prolyl-tRNA Synthetases: Towards Developing a Screening Method for Species-Specific InhibitorsR15GM117510 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN EAU CLAIRE · PI BHATTACHARYAY, SUDEEP, HATI, SANCHITA · 2016 to 2023
$878k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM117510
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A machine learning-based drug screening technique has been developed and optimized using a novel, stitched neural network architecture with trainable, graph convolution-based fingerprints as a base into an artificial neural network. The architecture is efficient, explainable, and performant as a tool for the binary classification of ligands based on a user-chosen docking score threshold. Assessment using two standardized virtual screening databases substantiated the architecture's ability to learn molecular features and substructures and predict ligand classes based on binding affinity values more effectively than similar contemporary counterparts. Furthermore, to highlight the architecture's utility to groups and laboratories with varying resources, experiments were carried out using randomly sampled small molecules from the ZINC database and their computational docking scores against six drug-design relevant proteins. This new architecture proved to be more efficient in screening molecules that less favorably bind to a specific target thereby retaining top-hit molecules. Compared to similar protocols developed using Morgan fingerprints, the neural fingerprint-based model shows superiority in retaining the best ligands while filtering molecules at a higher relative rate. Lastly, the explainability of the model was investigated; it was revealed that the model accurately emphasized important chemical substructures and atoms through the intermediate fingerprint, which, in turn, contributed heavily to the ultimate prediction of a ligand as binding tightly to a certain protein.

Identifiers

PMID39959102
PMCPMC11822703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.