ArticleACS omega2025
Efficient and Explainable Virtual Screening of Molecules through Fingerprint-Generating Networks Integrated with Artificial Neural Networks.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Graph Convolutional Neural Network-Enabled Frontier Molecular Orbital Prediction: A Case Study with Neurotransmitters and Antidepressants.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A machine learning-based drug screening technique has been developed and optimized using a novel, stitched neural network architecture with trainable, graph convolution-based fingerprints as a base into an artificial neural network. The architecture is efficient, explainable, and performant as a tool for the binary classification of ligands based on a user-chosen docking score threshold. Assessment using two standardized virtual screening databases substantiated the architecture's ability to learn molecular features and substructures and predict ligand classes based on binding affinity values more effectively than similar contemporary counterparts. Furthermore, to highlight the architecture's utility to groups and laboratories with varying resources, experiments were carried out using randomly sampled small molecules from the ZINC database and their computational docking scores against six drug-design relevant proteins. This new architecture proved to be more efficient in screening molecules that less favorably bind to a specific target thereby retaining top-hit molecules. Compared to similar protocols developed using Morgan fingerprints, the neural fingerprint-based model shows superiority in retaining the best ligands while filtering molecules at a higher relative rate. Lastly, the explainability of the model was investigated; it was revealed that the model accurately emphasized important chemical substructures and atoms through the intermediate fingerprint, which, in turn, contributed heavily to the ultimate prediction of a ligand as binding tightly to a certain protein.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.