ArticleACS omega2025
Uptake and Release Kinetics Longevity in Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels for Hydrophilic Drug Therapy.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The uptake and release of target molecules were studied in hydrogels as a function of time over a month to determine what, if any, deviation exists in these properties. Through the use of spectroscopic techniques such as FT-IR and UV-vis-NIR in combination with drug release kinetics and swelling kinetics studies, both the effect of imprinting and the effect of time could be substantially analyzed for hydrogels. Molecular imprinting provides a significant advantage over nonimprinted hydrogel samples through the sustainment of a first-order release profile throughout the month without significant deviations in the releasable concentration, while nonimprinted samples struggle in their capability to be consistently load-cycled. Changes between the imprinted and nonimprinted samples are not evidenced to be significant chemical deviations; rather, they are attributable to functionality differences between the release mechanisms of these hydrogels.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.