ArticleACS omega2025
UPLC-MS/MS Method for Simultaneous Quantification of Cyclosporine A and Urolithin A in Plasma and Interspecies Analysis Across Mammals Including Humans.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Novel LC-MS/MS Method for Monitoring Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Companion Animal Blood Plasma and Serum: Environmental and Health Implications.International journal of veterinary science and medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the past decade, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) has become pivotal in clinical diagnosis, drug discovery, and bioanalytical science due to its high sensitivity and rapid analysis. We have developed an ultrasensitive and robust LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous detection and quantification of cyclosporine A (CsA) and urolithin A (UA) employing ascomycin (ASC) and naringenin (NAR) as internal standards (ISTDs). The method was validated for clinical use, revealing interspecies differences between human plasma and other mammals (e.g., mouse, rat, feline, canine, and bovine serum). Validation parameters, including accuracy, precision, limits of quantification, specificity, selectivity, carryover, linearity, stability, and recovery, met acceptable ICH standards. Linear regression across the full calibration range (1-250 ng/mL for CsA and 0.5-125 ng/mL for UA) yielded an average R
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.