ReviewACS omega2025
A Review on Perception of Binding Kinetics in Affinity Biosensors: Challenges and Opportunities.
Review in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Characterizing Variations in Binding Kinetics of Affinity Biosensors: A Boundary-Layer and Site-Quality Approach.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy for Viral Diagnostics: Principles, Strategies, Clinical Challenges, and Future Directions.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Innovative Nanomaterial-Based Approaches for the Recognition of Amphetamine in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Management.Analytical science advances · 2026Review
- Practical Applications of 2D Material FET Biosensors: Functionalization Strategies and Detection Performance.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Integrating Functional Response and Target Binding for Mechanism-Centered Drug Screening by High-Mass MALDI-MS.ACS central science · 2026Article
- Supramolecular PDDA/PEDOT:PSS Biosensor for Early Pancreatic Cancer Detection via CA19-9: Clinical Validation on Human Blood Samples.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Recovering wastewater RNA for virome sequencing by systematically optimized tangential-flow ultrafiltration and Nanotrap microbiome particles.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Deep Learning-Driven Intelligent Fluorescent Probes: Advancements in Molecular Design for Accurate Food Safety Detection.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The Challenges and Opportunities of Protein Coronas for Nanoscale Biomolecular Sensing.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Review
- Plasmonic ELISA for Biomarker Detection: A Review of Mechanisms, Functionalization Strategies, and Emerging Modalities.ACS applied bio materials · 2025Review
- Nanosensors and Microsensors for Body Fluid Monitoring: Various Analyte Detection and Construction Solutions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are challenges associated with design and development of affinity biosensors due to the complicated multiphysics nature of the system. Understanding the binding interaction between target molecules and immobilized receptors and its kinetics is a crucial step to develop robust and reliable biosensor technologies. Evaluation of binding kinetics in biosensors becomes more important and challenging for clinical samples with a complex matrix. Despite drastic advancements in biosensor technologies, having a practical perception of the binding kinetics has remained a critical bottleneck due to limited fundamental understanding. This Review aims to provide a comprehensive discussion on concepts and advances developed so far for the perception of binding kinetics in affinity biosensors. Here, modeling approaches and measurement techniques are presented to characterize the binding interactions in biosensor technologies, while the effect of fouling and secondary factors in the binding interactions will be discussed in the concept of kinetics. This Review will investigate the existing research gaps and potential opportunities in the perception of binding kinetics and challenges to develop robust and reliable biosensors.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.