ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2024
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Extended application of intracanal medicaments such as calcium hydroxide (CH) and triple antibiotic paste (TAP) is documented to reduce dentin's resistance to fracture. Aim: This study intended to evaluate the resistance to fracture of root dentin treated with different medicaments - CH, TAP, CH with chlorhexidine (CHX) and lycopene (LP), and chitosan acetate (CA) - over 7, 14, and 42 days. Materials and Methods: Seventy-five single-rooted human mandibular premolars were biomechanically prepared and categorized into five groups based on the medicament used, with further subdivision based on application duration. Fracture resistance was tested after each time interval. Statistical Analysis: Within-group comparisons were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), while inter-group comparisons used a one-way ANOVA test at a 5% significance level. Results: At 7 days, no statistically notable differences were found among the groups. However, by day 14 and day 42, the groups treated with CH and TAP exhibited significantly reduced fracture resistance compared to the other groups. Conclusion: Combining LP with CH and CHX, or using CA, did not reduce radicular dentin fracture resistance, unlike TAP and CH. These findings suggest LP and CA as viable alternatives, potentially minimizing the adverse effects of traditional treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.