ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2024
Identification of the bacterial phylotypes
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Dental caries is a progressive irreversible microbial disease. Different regions of the carious dentin contain different bacteria in various proportions. With the recent advent of new techniques in molecular biology, our understanding of the microbial agents associated with dental caries has grown tremendously. It is essential to identify and quantify the organisms from the diseased sites quickly and reliably. Fluorescent Materials and Methods: A total of 60 subjects were included in the study. Two samples were obtained from one patient leading to a total of 120 samples. Carious samples were obtained for the test group, and for the control group, a subgingival plaque sample was collected. The collected specimens of the test group were transported in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and the subgingival plaque samples in reduced transport fluid. The samples were then processed for assessing the prevalence of the bacteria using fluorescence Results: The results of the present study showed the presence of phylotypes Conclusion: FISH is a simple, quick, and versatile approach for bacterial identification and quantification. It also has a high sensitivity, allowing it to detect single bacterial cells. This method can be applied directly to clinical samples and utilized as a rapid diagnostic tool for detecting the presence of newer phylotypes in deep dental caries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.