Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39958998›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of medicine open2025

Development of a New Malnutrition Screening Tool for Patients: Human Key Tool of Nutrition.

Kotono Oishi, Arisa Inoue-Hamano, Yasuhiro Hamada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of medicine open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kotono OishiDepartment of Therapeutic Nutrition, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan.
Arisa Inoue-HamanoDepartment of Therapeutic Nutrition, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan.
Yasuhiro HamadaDepartment of Therapeutic Nutrition, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: Malnutrition is related to increased mortality and poor outcome. Therefore, early diagnosis and intervention of malnutrition are recommended. However, the optimal nutrition screening tool for diagnosing malnutrition remains undetermined. This study aimed to verify the discrimination and difficulty of nutrition screening items through item response theory (IRT) analysis and develop a simpler malnutrition screening tool. Methods: This study enrolled 10,375 patients aged ≥18 years who were admitted at Tokushima University Hospital. Patients who were pregnant had short-term hospitalization (≤3 days), were hospitalized only in the weekend, could not hear clearly, and were hospitalized merely for examination were excluded. A skilled dietitian performed the Subjective Global Assessment, rating a good nutritional status as A, moderate malnutrition as B, and severe malnutrition as C. Results: According to Subjective Global Assessment, we classified 7119 patients as A, 2892 as B, and 364 as C. Between these classes, the total number of application items was significantly lower in class A but significantly higher in class C. In the discrimination of each item calculated by IRT analysis, the highest discrimination item was "Has your food intake been less than usual?", followed by "Have you had anorexia?", "Have you had vomiting?", "Have you had nausea?", "Have you had dehydration?", and "Have you lost weight?". Conclusions: Human Key Tool of Nutrition, which is based on the IRT analysis results, is a new simple nutrition screening tool developed by us. Human Key Tool of Nutrition can contribute to the widespread use of nutrition screening.

Indexed as

Item response theoryNutrition screeningSubjective Global Assessment

Identifiers

PMID39958998
PMCPMC11830330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.