ArticleAmerican journal of medicine open2025
Development of a New Malnutrition Screening Tool for Patients: Human Key Tool of Nutrition.
Article in American journal of medicine open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence of disease related malnutrition assessed by NRS2002, STAMP, MNA-SF, one-step and two-step GLIM at admission and discharge: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: Malnutrition is related to increased mortality and poor outcome. Therefore, early diagnosis and intervention of malnutrition are recommended. However, the optimal nutrition screening tool for diagnosing malnutrition remains undetermined. This study aimed to verify the discrimination and difficulty of nutrition screening items through item response theory (IRT) analysis and develop a simpler malnutrition screening tool. Methods: This study enrolled 10,375 patients aged ≥18 years who were admitted at Tokushima University Hospital. Patients who were pregnant had short-term hospitalization (≤3 days), were hospitalized only in the weekend, could not hear clearly, and were hospitalized merely for examination were excluded. A skilled dietitian performed the Subjective Global Assessment, rating a good nutritional status as A, moderate malnutrition as B, and severe malnutrition as C. Results: According to Subjective Global Assessment, we classified 7119 patients as A, 2892 as B, and 364 as C. Between these classes, the total number of application items was significantly lower in class A but significantly higher in class C. In the discrimination of each item calculated by IRT analysis, the highest discrimination item was "Has your food intake been less than usual?", followed by "Have you had anorexia?", "Have you had vomiting?", "Have you had nausea?", "Have you had dehydration?", and "Have you lost weight?". Conclusions: Human Key Tool of Nutrition, which is based on the IRT analysis results, is a new simple nutrition screening tool developed by us. Human Key Tool of Nutrition can contribute to the widespread use of nutrition screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.