Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39958969›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in food science2024

Alternative proteins; A path to sustainable diets and environment.

Shima Jafarzadeh, Zeinab Qazanfarzadeh, Mahsa Majzoobi, Samira Sheiband, Nazila Oladzadabbasabad, Yasaman Esmaeili, Colin J Barrow, Wendy Timms

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in food science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Structure-Forming Properties ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shima JafarzadehCentre for Sustainable Bioproducts, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, 3216, Australia.
Zeinab QazanfarzadehDivision of Industrial Biotechnology, Department of Life Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Mahsa MajzoobiBiosciences and Food Technology, RMIT University, Bundoora West Campus, Plenty Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3083, Australia.
Samira SheibandFood Technology Division, School of Industrial Technology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Penang, Malaysia.
Nazila OladzadabbasabadSchool of Science, STEM College, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, 3083, Australia.
Yasaman EsmaeiliSchool of Engineering, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, 3216, Australia.
Colin J BarrowCentre for Sustainable Bioproducts, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, 3216, Australia.
Wendy TimmsCentre for Sustainable Bioproducts, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, 3216, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With a growing global population and the resulting pressure on natural resources, the supply of high-value protein has become increasingly limited. The rise of environmental and ethical concerns has led to the emergence of meat analogues as a credible alternative to traditional animal-derived meat. Growing demand for plant-based protein sources has gained attention as viable alternatives to conventional animal proteins. This article reviews commercially available plant proteins for meat replacement and evaluates recent research on producing meat analogues, highlighting their advantages and limitations. Beyond production, an examination of the physicochemical, textural, and structural attributes of the meat alternatives is conducted, highlighting the improvements made in achieving sensory and nutritional parallels with animal-derived meat. Furthermore, this article explores the current commercial applications of meat alternatives, highlighting the challenges faced in their widespread adoption and suggesting future research directions. The comparison of the environmental impacts of plant proteins and animal proteins is also presented. The ultimate goal is to develop meat substitutes that closely mimic the sensory, nutritional, and aesthetic qualities of real meat. Despite promising innovations in processing technologies, challenges remain that researchers are actively addressing to close the gap between plant-based meat analogues and animal-derived counterparts.

Indexed as

Alternative proteinsMeat alternativePlant-based proteinsSustainable foods

Identifiers

PMID39958969
PMCPMC11827122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.