ArticleArchives of academic emergency medicine2025
TERMINAL-24 Score in Predicting Early and In-hospital Mortality of Trauma Patients; a Cross-sectional.
Article in Archives of academic emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of Trauma Scoring Systems for Predicting Mortality in Emergency Department Patients with Traffic-Related Multiple Trauma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Determining the trauma patients' prognosis is crucial for patients' safety, triage, and appropriate management. This study aimed to evaluate the screening performance of Traumatic Emergency Room Major Injury Death At Least 24 hours (TERMINAL-24) score in predicting the mortality of trauma patients. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the emergency department (ED) of a referral trauma center, between October 2023 and September 2024. The main goals of the project were determining the value of TERMINAL-24 score in predicting early (within 8 hours of admission to ED) and in-hospital mortality of multi-trauma patients as well as comparing the accuracy of TERMINAL-24 with other trauma severity scores (GAP, RGAP, NTS) in this regard. Results: 963 multi-trauma patients were included in this study. The mean age of the patients was 37.75±17.10 years (73.2% male). 55 patients died in the emergency department and 46 patients died during hospitalization in other departments. Male gender (p = 0.009), older age (p =0.011), traffic accidents (p = 0.005), more critical vital signs (p = <0.001), admitting in neurosurgery ward (p < 0.001), and higher trauma severity (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with higher mortality rate. The area under the curve (AUC) of TERMINAL-24 score in predicting early and in-hospital mortality of trauma patients were 0.964 (95%CI: 0.937-0.991) and 0.954 (95%CI: 0.925-0.983), respectively. The specificity and sensitivity of TERMINAL-24 score for predicting early mortality at its best cut-off point (cut-off = 2.5) were 95.04% (95%CI: 93.43-96.28) and 96.36% (95%CI: 87.63-99.35), respectively. For predicting in-hospital mortality, these measures were 98.84% (95%CI: 97.88-99.37) and 87.13% (95%CI: 79.22-92.32), respectively (best cut-off = 2.5). Conclusions: It seems that, TERMINAL-24 score has the same accuracy in predicting both early and in-hospital outcomes of trauma patients. Considering the calculation formula of this score and its simplicity, it can be used in pre-hospital and in-hospital settings to predict the outcome of trauma patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.