ReviewLiver research (Beijing, China)2023
Progress on clinical prognosis assessment in liver failure.
Review in Liver research (Beijing, China), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- New Insights into Cardiac Intensive Care.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Pre-TACE CK-MB/CK Ratio as an Independent Prognostic Biomarker in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
- A machine learning model for 90-day mortality prediction in hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure: the pivotal role of CALLY index.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Nanoparticle-based therapeutic strategies for chronic liver diseases: Advances and insights.Liver research (Beijing, China) · 2025Review
- Mas Signaling Potentiates Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Formation Induced by Endothelial Cells Derived S1P in Mice with Acute Liver Failure.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Burn-induced mitochondrial dysfunction in hepatocytes: The role of methylation-controlled J protein silencing.The journal of trauma and acute care surgery · 2025Article
- Long-term efficacy and safety of tenofovir alafenamide, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and entecavir in treating hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure: A 144-week data analysis.Liver research (Beijing, China) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liver failure is a group of clinical syndromes with a mortality rate of >50%. The accurate evaluation of severity in patients with liver failure has been a meaningful and hot topic in clinical research and an important guide for liver transplantation. Numerous prognosis studies have emerged in recent years with high accuracy and adequate validity. Nonetheless, different models utilize distinct parameters and have unequal efficiencies, leading to a specific value and unique application situations for each model. This review focused on the progress in recent prognostic studies including the model for end-stage liver disease, sequential organ failure assessment and its derivative models, the Chinese Group on the Study of Severe Hepatitis B Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure, the Tongji prognostic predictor model, and other emerging prognostic models and predictors. This review aims to assist clinicians understand the framework of recent models and choose the appropriate model and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.