Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39958943›Full record

ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2025

Exploring Access to Care in Zimbabwe Using the 3-Delay Model.

Katerina J Green, Naboth N Matinhira, Amiti Jain, Tissiana Vallecillo, Priya Arya, Estephania Candelo, Munyaradzi Katiro, Tafadzwa Nyamurowa, Dontre' M Douse, Joshua P Wiedermann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Katerina J GreenDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Mayo Clinic Florida Jacksonville Florida USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5937-4822
Naboth N MatinhiraDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery University of Zimbabwe Harare Zimbabwe.
Amiti JainDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Medical College Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
Tissiana VallecilloDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine Rochester Minnesota USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3095-4369
Priya AryaDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Mercer University School of Medicine Savannah Georgia USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6423-6165
Estephania CandeloDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Mayo Clinic Florida Jacksonville Florida USA.
Munyaradzi KatiroDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery University of Zimbabwe Harare Zimbabwe.
Tafadzwa NyamurowaDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery University of Zimbabwe Harare Zimbabwe.
Dontre' M DouseDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA.
Joshua P WiedermannDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: We aim to identify the diversity of barriers to care for otolaryngology-head and neck surgery patients in Harare, Zimbabwe. Methods: Interviews were conducted at four general otolaryngology clinics in Harare in October 2022.The patient population included children and adults presenting to either government or private clinics. Via interpreter, six standardized questions were discussed with each patient. Survey responses were used to categorize patients into one or more of three types of delays: (1) deciding to seek care, (2) reaching the appropriate healthcare facility, and (3) receiving adequate care after reaching that facility. Results: Forty-six patients participated in this survey. The average time from problem presentation to treatment in this population was 16.3 months. Twenty-six percent of patients experienced more than one type of delay. The most common type of delay was Type 3 (67%). Many of these patients reached appropriate facilities but could not receive timely treatment due to lengthy wait times. Type 1 delays affected 35% of patients. Notable causes were fear of doctors, preference for traditional healing, or ignorance to a treatable problem. Type 2 delays were also reported in 37%, commonly due to long distance and time to travel and insufficient finances for these journeys. Conclusions: ENT patients in Zimbabwe experience a myriad of delays to receiving appropriate care. Systemic issues, including backlogged surgical lists, convoluted referral patterns, and poor transportation infrastructure, are significant contributors to patient delays. The 3-delay model is useful for identifying barriers to care for future efforts to improve patient access to safe and affordable surgical care. Level of Evidence: Level VI.

Indexed as

delaysglobal surgeryhead and neck cancerotolaryngologyZimbabwe

Identifiers

PMID39958943
PMCPMC11826330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.