ArticleData in brief2024
Data for rating the perception of biological and intentional motion stimuli: Perceptual validation pilot study.
Article in Data in brief, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research on motion perception and the mirror neuron system in humans relies on non-invasive techniques such as electroencephalography and functional magnetic resonance imaging. However, these techniques depend upon the observation of concrete stimulus sets, the design and perception of which are expected to align with the researcher's definitions. Consequently, rating studies are conducted in experimental psychology to ensure consistency. Despite their significance, data from rating experiments are often omitted from publications. This manuscript provides access to a stimulus set and associated rating experiments' data to address this gap and to allow other researchers to employ it. Over the course of two experiments to which participants were randomly assigned, data were collected on the perceived source (origin), intentionality, and category of movements, as well as the attention captured by stimuli, all assessed via six-point Likert scales. It was revealed that participants rated the stimuli showing
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.