Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39958933›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025

A comprehensive analysis of the uterine microbiome in endometrial cancer patients - identification of

Olga Kuźmycz, Aleksandra Kowalczyk, Aleksandra Bolanowska, Anna Drozdzowska, Jakub Lach, Wiktoria Wierzbińska, Tomasz Kluz, Paweł Stączek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Olga KuźmyczDepartment of Molecular Microbiology, Institute of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Immunology, University of Lodz, Faculty of Biology and Environmental, Protection, Lodz, Poland.
Aleksandra KowalczykDepartment of Molecular Microbiology, Institute of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Immunology, University of Lodz, Faculty of Biology and Environmental, Protection, Lodz, Poland.
Aleksandra BolanowskaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Fryderyk Chopin University Hospital No. 1, Rzeszow, Poland.
Anna DrozdzowskaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Fryderyk Chopin University Hospital No. 1, Rzeszow, Poland.
Jakub LachDepartment of Molecular Microbiology, Institute of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Immunology, University of Lodz, Faculty of Biology and Environmental, Protection, Lodz, Poland.
Wiktoria WierzbińskaDepartment of Molecular Microbiology, Institute of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Immunology, University of Lodz, Faculty of Biology and Environmental, Protection, Lodz, Poland.
Tomasz KluzDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Fryderyk Chopin University Hospital No. 1, Rzeszow, Poland.
Paweł StączekDepartment of Molecular Microbiology, Institute of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Immunology, University of Lodz, Faculty of Biology and Environmental, Protection, Lodz, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Endometrial cancer (EC) is a significant gynecological malignancy with increasing incidence worldwide. Emerging evidence highlights the role of the uterine microbiome in the pathogenesis of EC. This study aims to characterize the uterine microbiome in EC patients and identify potential microbial biomarkers, with a focus on Methods: The endocervical canal swabs from patients with EC (n=16) and non-cancerous patients (EM, n=13) were collected. The V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was sequenced using the Illumina platform. Bioinformatic analyses were performed with QIIME2, and statistical comparisons were conducted to assess differences in microbial composition and diversity. Results: The α-diversity metrics, including Shannon entropy and observed amplicon sequence variants (ASVs), revealed significantly higher microbial diversity in EC samples compared to EM. Discussion: The study provides evidence of distinct microbial signatures in EC, with

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsMicrobiotaUterusAgedBiomarkersDNA, BacterialFemaleFibroblastsHumansMiddle AgedOxidative StressRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNABiomarkersDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA metagenomicsAnaerococcus vaginalisANCOM analysisendometrial cancermicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID39958933
PMCPMC11827426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.