Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39958905›Full record

ArticleGland surgery2025

Comparison of endoscopic surgical approaches for total thyroidectomy: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Tengjiang Long, Junlei Li, Yuquan Yuan, Zeyu Yang, Peng Xu, Bin Pan, Yiceng Sun, Supeng Yin, Chengzhi Zhao, Fan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gland surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tengjiang Long *Graduate School of Medicine, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Junlei Li *Graduate School of Medicine, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yuquan YuanGynecological Oncology Center, Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children, Chongqing, China.
Zeyu YangDepartment of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Chongqing General Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Peng XuDepartment of High Altitude Disease, Xizang Military General Hospital, Lhasa City, China.
Bin PanDepartment of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Chongqing General Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Yiceng SunDepartment of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Chongqing General Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Supeng YinDepartment of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Chongqing General Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Chengzhi ZhaoGynecological Oncology Center, Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children, Chongqing, China.
Fan ZhangGraduate School of Medicine, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Different approaches to endoscopic total thyroidectomy are emerging for the treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer, raising clinical concerns about comprehensively evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of these approaches. In this study, we aimed to conduct a network meta-analysis to compare different endoscopic surgical approaches to total thyroidectomy, revealing their respective advantages and limitations. Methods: PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases were searched from their inception until March 2024. Pairwise meta-analysis and Bayesian network meta-analysis were performed. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to determine the probability that each surgical approach for the best individual outcome. Results: Twenty-one studies comprising 4,361 patients were included. Based on the SUCRA value, the endoscopic transoral approach (EOA) retrieved the highest number of lymph nodes (LNs) (SUCRA =0.59) among all endoscopic surgical approaches. The minimally invasive video-assisted approach (MIVAA) significantly shortened the operative time (SUCRA =0.77) compared to other endoscopic surgical approaches. MIVAA ranked as the most effective surgical approach for reducing the rate of permanent hypoparathyroidism (SUCRA =0.81) and controlling intraoperative bleeding (SUCRA =0.77). The endoscopic gasless transaxillary approach (EGAA) effectively shortened the hospital stay (SUCRA =0.95) and reduced the rate of transient hypoparathyroidism (SUCRA =0.74). The endoscopic bilateral areola (EBAA) approach ranked as the most effective surgical approach for preventing recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy (SUCRA =0.92). Conclusions: The surgical outcomes of endoscopic total thyroidectomy are comparable to those of open thyroidectomy. MIVAA was superior to other endoscopic surgical approaches in terms of operative time, intraoperative bleeding volume, and permanent hypoparathyroidism rate. EOA demonstrated a significant advantage in LNs retrieval. EBAA was superior in protecting the RLN.

Indexed as

Differentiated thyroid cancerendoscopic thyroidectomy (ET)meta-analysissystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39958905
PMCPMC11826257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.