Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39958902›Full record

ArticleGland surgery2025

A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the use of elagolix therapy alone or in combination with add-back therapy to treat women with uterine fibroid associated heavy menstrual bleeding.

Xianying Wang, Jingxin Li, Yang Liu, Yingying Zheng, Xiaoli Wang, Guoqiang Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gland surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xianying WangDepartment of Pharmacy, Hebei Medical University Third Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.
Jingxin LiDepartment of Pharmacy, Hebei Chest Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.
Yang LiuDepartment of Pharmacy, Hebei Medical University Third Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.
Yingying ZhengDepartment of Pharmacy, Hebei Medical University Third Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.
Xiaoli WangDepartment of Pharmacy, Hebei Medical University Third Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.
Guoqiang LiuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Hebei Medical University Third Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Elagolix is an oral small molecule second-generation nonpeptide gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist drug that can quickly and reversibly inhibit female gonadotropins and ovarian sex hormones. Previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated the efficacy and safety of elagolix alone or in combination with add-back therapy to treat women with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) caused by uterine fibroids. Hence, this study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of elagolix alone or in combination with add-back therapy for the treatment of uterine fibroids with HMB. Methods: The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for randomized controlled studies on the application of elagolix alone or with add-back therapy in patients with uterine fibroids and HMB from databases establishment to June 15, 2021. The outcomes reference menstrual blood loss (MBL), amenorrhea, uterine fibroid symptom quality of life (UFS-QoL), hemoglobin level, bone mineral density loss, and adverse events (AEs). The primary endpoint is MBL. Fixed/random effects models were used to calculate the risk ratio (RR)/mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each outcome. Results: Two studies with four trials involving 1,217 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with the placebo, when elagolix was used alone or given with additional therapy, the number of participants who satisfied the MBL was greater (MBL <80 mL and MBL was reduced by more than 50% in the last month), improved hemoglobin levels (increased by more than 2 g/dL from baseline to the final treatment month) criteria as well as triggered amenorrhea. Elagolix alone or in combination with add-back therapy improved the quality of life of patients. Compared with the elagolix treatment alone or with add-back therapy, the placebo was superior in terms of less bone mineral density change and a lower incidence of AEs. Conclusions: This study indicated that elagolix alone or in use with add-back therapy can be considered as a satisfactory treatment plan for the majority of patients who are diagnosed with uterine fibroids and HMB; however, the specific treatment plan should also consider patients' physical condition and any adverse reactions to the drug, based on existing research.

Indexed as

Elagolixheavy menstrual bleeding (HMB)meta-analysissystematic reviewuterine fibroids

Identifiers

PMID39958902
PMCPMC11826254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.