Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39958846›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2025

Comparative numerical analysis of astigmatism tolerance in bifocal, extended depth-of-focus, and trifocal intraocular lenses.

Jongin You, Mooseok Jang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jongin YouDepartment of Bio and Brain Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3804-4829
Mooseok JangDepartment of Bio and Brain Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1977-9539

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here, we quantitatively assess the effect of astigmatism on visual functions in eyes with three different commercial multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) using a customized finite eye model. Our proposed model implements a full wave analysis of the whole eye structure with diffractive multifocal IOLs under polychromatic conditions. The proposed eye model evaluates the energy efficiency of each focus at varying degrees of corneal astigmatism with the light-in-the-bucket metrics for bifocal (Restor), extended depth-of-focus (Symfony), and trifocal IOLs (POD-F). Better tolerance under astigmatic conditions was observed in the order of Symfony, Restor, and POD-F, highlighting the need to consider multifocal toric IOLs with corneal astigmatism greater than +1.5 D, + 1.0 D, and +1.0 D for Symfony, Restor, and POD-F, respectively. Furthermore, we revealed the way that the optical properties of multifocal IOLs, including the optical power of the diffractive part, the effect of high-order harmonics, and chromatic aberration, interplay to determine the tolerance for corneal aberration. The numerical analysis closely agrees with previous clinical studies on determining the indication for multifocal toric IOLs, suggesting the clinical usability of the presented method in predicting the postoperative visual function of patients on a customized basis.

Identifiers

PMID39958846
PMCPMC11828457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.