ArticleBiomedical optics express2025
Prediction of monocular defocus curves in pseudophakia with different pupil sizes.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of Monocular and Binocular Visual Acuity for the Pseudophakic Patients Using Simulated Modulation Transfer Function.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Limitations of OTF-based metrics for predicting through-focus visual acuity in pseudophakic eyes.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Reliability of Prediction Models for the Functional Classification of a Sinusoidal Intraocular Lens Depending on Pupil Diameter.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Ocular biometric parameters associated with the performance of actual near-add power in multifocal intraocular lenses.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Existing models for predicting clinical visual acuity (VA) following lens replacement surgery use controlled experimental conditions where pupil size is typically fixed. However, pupil size may influence visual performance depending on the design of the intraocular lens (IOL) implanted. This study compares optical bench testing metrics to clinical VA in pseudophakic patients with different pupil sizes and IOL models. The area under the modulation transfer function (MTFa) and the weighted optical transfer function (wOTF) were obtained at vergences ranging from -3 D to 0.5 D, and different pupil sizes: 2, 3, and 4.5 mm. The simulated VA values obtained for both metrics were well correlated with clinical data (R
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.