Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39958834›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in pediatrics2024

Telenursing on primary family caregivers and children with disabilities: a scoping review.

Kaori Nishigaki, Noyuri Yamaji, Naho Adachi, Tomoko Kamei, Kyoko Kobayashi, Shota Kakazu, Yuki Yonekura

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kaori NishigakiDepartment of Child Health Nursing, Graduate School of Nursing Sciences, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Noyuri YamajiGlobal Health Nursing, Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Naho AdachiDepartment of Child Health Nursing, Graduate School of Nursing Sciences, Aichi Prefectural University, Aichi, Japan.
Tomoko KameiDepartment of Gerontological Nursing, Graduate School of Nursing Sciences, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kyoko KobayashiDepartment of Child Health Nursing, Graduate School of Nursing Sciences, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Shota KakazuDepartment of Child Health Nursing, Graduate School of Nursing Sciences, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuki YonekuraDepartment of Nursing Informatics, Graduate School of Nursing Sciences, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the need for continued support for children with disabilities and their families, COVID-19 has made the support difficult. Telenursing can monitor daily life and support from a remote location, continuously and at a low cost. However, there are few practical reports on its use in children with disabilities. Objective: This scoping review aims to summarize the published literature on telenursing for children with disabilities in home care settings. Methods: We included studies involving children (0-18 years of age) with disabilities and their families and specified telecommunication assessment, monitoring, and intervention such as tele-education, teleconsultation and telementoring involving nurses via information communication technologies. We included studies that used any design written in English or Japanese. A comprehensive search was conducted on March 14, 2021 using six databases: MEDLINE via PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, PsycINFO, and Ichushi Web. Two or more reviewers individually screened eligible studies according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram. Data on the characteristics of the included studies, telecommunications technology interventions, and children with disabilities were mapped in tables. Results: Eleven studies, published between 2003 and 2020, met the inclusion criteria. Only one study used the term "telenursing," while others used "telehealth" and other terms, which involved multidisciplinary support such as physicians and social workers in addition to nurses. Although there were various types of telecommunications technology interventions, they were categorized as consultation, healthcare provision, monitoring, and education. Most studies have examined telecommunication technology interventions by healthcare professionals, including nurses. Five studies focused on children with medical complexities, and two focused on children with neurodevelopmental disabilities, including developmental delays. There is insufficient information on telecommunications technology interventions, especially assessment tools, trigger points, and the status of the target population. Conclusion: This scoping review aimed to map the published literature on telenursing for children with disabilities and their families in home care settings. Available evidence indicates a lack of research focusing on the implementation of telecommunications for children with disabilities and their families. Further research is required to assess the effects of telecommunications technology interventions. Additionally, they should provide information for implementing telecommunication technology safety. Scoping Review Registration: Figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21747047.v1).

Indexed as

children with disabilitiesCOVID-19 pandemichome carescoping reviewtelenursing

Identifiers

PMID39958834
PMCPMC11825520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.