ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Development and validation of a prediction model for acute kidney injury following cardiac valve surgery.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between intrarenal venous flow and postoperative acute kidney injury in cardiac surgery patients following cardiopulmonary bypass: a prospective cohort study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Observational
- Nomogram prediction of acute kidney injury following modified Morrow myectomy in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: insights from 12 years of outcomes.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Development and Internal Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Acute Kidney Injury After Cardiac Valve Surgery Using the Serum Uric Acid-to-Albumin Ratio.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Excess Conventional Ultrafiltration Volume Increases Risk for Postoperative Cardiac Surgery-Associated Acute Kidney Injury.Kidney diseases (Basel, Switzerland)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) often accompanies cardiac valve surgery, and worsens patient outcome. The aim of our study is to identify preoperative and intraoperative independent risk factors for AKI in patients undergoing cardiac valve surgery. Using these factors, we developed a risk prediction model for AKI after cardiac valve surgery and conducted external validation. Methods: Our retrospective study recruited 497 adult patients undergoing cardiac valve surgery as a derivation cohort between February and August 2023. Patient demographics, including medical history and perioperative clinical information, were acquired, and patients were classified into one of two cohorts, AKI and non-AKI, according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines. Using binary logistic stepwise regression analysis, we identified independent AKI risk factors after cardiac valve surgery. Lastly, we constructed a nomogram and conducted external validation in a validation cohort comprising 200 patients. The performance of the nomogram was evaluated based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: In the derivation cohort, 172 developed AKI (34.6%). Relative to non-AKI patients, the AKI patients exhibited elevated postoperative complication incidences and worse outcome. Based on multivariate analysis, advanced age (OR: 1.855; Conclusion: Several perioperative factors modulate AKI development following cardiac valve surgery, resulting in poor patient prognosis. The proposed AKI predictive model is both sensitive and precise, and can assist in high-risk patient screening in the clinics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.