ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025
The diagnosis of DIC: a current overview.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Post-Transfusion Purpura: A Clinical Case With Alveolar Haemorrhage.Respirology case reports · 2026Article
- Establishing the clinical utility of integrated quasistatic acoustic tweezing thromboelastometry for blood coagulation analysis.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2026Article
- Factors Associated With Mortality in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) With Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC): A National Inpatient Sample Analysis.Advances in hematology · 2026Article
- Revisiting the Concept of DIC: A Phenotype-guided Framework for Modern Hemostatic Medicine.Juntendo medical journal · 2026Review
- Smart Thrombosis Care: The Rise of Closed-Loop Diagnosis-to-Treatment Nano Systems.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The name of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and its diagnostic criteria remain controversial. DIC is a clinical syndrome caused by a variety of etiologies, which determines its high heterogeneity. It is inappropriate to adopt the same diagnostic criteria. DIC has its common characteristics. First, in most DIC, thrombosis and bleeding coexist. Second, DIC is a dynamic process. Third, endothelial cell injury and systemic coagulation activation are the core of DIC. Fourth, DIC is an initiating factor of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). There are still controversies about the diagnostic criteria of DIC. First, it relies on clinical manifestations and laboratory tests, which cannot reflect pathophysiology. Second, the clinical manifestations were not sensitive or specific. Third, there is a lack of sensitive biomarkers. Fourth, the parameters in the current diagnostic criteria cannot fully reflect the actual coagulation function. Fifth, it is obviously inappropriate to use the same scoring system for diagnosis of clinical syndromes with different etiologies and pathophysiology. Therefore, it is urgent to re-establish the diagnostic criteria for DIC. In recent years, the understanding of DIC has been continuously improved, including the in-depth understanding of the pathogenesis, the classification of coagulation phenotypes, and the development of the "two-step" diagnosis of DIC, etc. All of these contribute to the establishment of new diagnostic criteria for DIC. In conclusion, it is necessary to develop personalized diagnostic criteria based on etiology, reflecting pathophysiological mechanisms, establishing clear cut-off values for parameters, being clinical applicable, being globally unified, and most importantly, being able to identify therapeutic targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.