Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39958822›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025

The diagnosis of DIC: a current overview.

Hongyu Yang, Xiaochun Ma, Xu Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hongyu YangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Xiaochun MaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Xu LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The name of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and its diagnostic criteria remain controversial. DIC is a clinical syndrome caused by a variety of etiologies, which determines its high heterogeneity. It is inappropriate to adopt the same diagnostic criteria. DIC has its common characteristics. First, in most DIC, thrombosis and bleeding coexist. Second, DIC is a dynamic process. Third, endothelial cell injury and systemic coagulation activation are the core of DIC. Fourth, DIC is an initiating factor of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). There are still controversies about the diagnostic criteria of DIC. First, it relies on clinical manifestations and laboratory tests, which cannot reflect pathophysiology. Second, the clinical manifestations were not sensitive or specific. Third, there is a lack of sensitive biomarkers. Fourth, the parameters in the current diagnostic criteria cannot fully reflect the actual coagulation function. Fifth, it is obviously inappropriate to use the same scoring system for diagnosis of clinical syndromes with different etiologies and pathophysiology. Therefore, it is urgent to re-establish the diagnostic criteria for DIC. In recent years, the understanding of DIC has been continuously improved, including the in-depth understanding of the pathogenesis, the classification of coagulation phenotypes, and the development of the "two-step" diagnosis of DIC, etc. All of these contribute to the establishment of new diagnostic criteria for DIC. In conclusion, it is necessary to develop personalized diagnostic criteria based on etiology, reflecting pathophysiological mechanisms, establishing clear cut-off values for parameters, being clinical applicable, being globally unified, and most importantly, being able to identify therapeutic targets.

Indexed as

coagulationdiagnostic criteriadisseminated intravascular coagulationfibrinolysisplatelet

Identifiers

PMID39958822
PMCPMC11825743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.