Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39958812›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

An Established Plant Invader May Still Benefit From Increasing Genetic Diversity-Insights From Artificial Populations in a Common Garden Experiment.

L Y Watermann, W Durka, A Erfmeier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

L Y WatermannKiel University, Institute for Ecosystem Research/Geobotany Kiel Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8905-0498
W DurkaDepartment of Community Ecology Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ Halle (Saale) Germany.
A ErfmeierKiel University, Institute for Ecosystem Research/Geobotany Kiel Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic diversity and competitive ability, though extensively studied in the context of biological invasions, are still poorly understood in their relative importance, especially when shifting the perspective from an individual plant's phenotype to overall population performance. Most approaches addressing the role of genetic diversity involve the comparison of standing genetic variation in field populations combined with experimental treatments on individual plants. Composing predefined mixtures of populations to manipulate genetic diversity would be an experimental approach to test for direct effects on population performance. We determined pairwise genetic distances among 16 invasive and 22 native populations of

Identifiers

PMID39958812
PMCPMC11826087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.