Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39958810›Full record

ArticleJournal of structural biology: X2025

Protein identification using Cryo-EM and artificial intelligence guides improved sample purification.

Kenneth D Carr, Dane Evan D Zambrano, Connor Weidle, Alex Goodson, Helen E Eisenach, Harley Pyles, Alexis Courbet, Neil P King, Andrew J Borst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of structural biology: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Artificial intelligence in structural biology: Preface.Structural dynamics (Melville, N.Y.) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. AlphaFold3: An Overview of Applications and Performance Insights.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Atomically accurate de novo design of antibodies with RFdiffusion.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kenneth D CarrDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Dane Evan D ZambranoDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Connor WeidleDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Alex GoodsonDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Helen E EisenachDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Harley PylesDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Alexis CourbetDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Neil P KingDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Andrew J BorstDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

Funding

ChimeraX -- Next Generation Visualization and Analysis Software for Multiscale ModelingR01GM129325 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FERRIN, THOMAS E · 2018 to 2025
$5.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM129325
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein purification is essential in protein biochemistry, structural biology, and protein design, enabling the determination of protein structures, the study of biological mechanisms, and the characterization of both natural and de novo designed proteins. However, standard purification strategies often encounter challenges, such as unintended co-purification of contaminants alongside the target protein. This issue is particularly problematic for self-assembling protein nanomaterials, where unexpected geometries may reflect novel assembly states, cross-contamination, or native proteins originating from the expression host. Here, we used an automated structure-to-sequence pipeline to first identify an unknown co-purifying protein found in several purified designed protein samples. By integrating cryo-electron microscopy (Cryo-EM), ModelAngelo's sequence-agnostic model-building, and Protein BLAST, we identified the contaminant as dihydrolipoamide succinyltransferase (DLST). This identification was validated through comparisons with DLST structures in the Protein Data Bank, AlphaFold 3 predictions based on the DLST sequence from our E. coli expression vector, and traditional biochemical methods. The identification informed subsequent modifications to our purification protocol, which successfully excluded DLST from future preparations. To explore the potential broader utility of this approach, we benchmarked four computational methods for DLST identification across varying resolution ranges. This study demonstrates the successful application of a structure-to-sequence protein identification workflow, integrating Cryo-EM, ModelAngelo, Protein BLAST, and AlphaFold 3 predictions, to identify and ultimately help guide the removal of DLST from sample purification efforts. It highlights the potential of combining Cryo-EM with AI-driven tools for accurate protein identification and addressing purification challenges across diverse contexts in protein science.

Indexed as

AlphaFold 3Automated Model BuildingContaminationCryo-Electron MicroscopyCryo-EMDihydrolipoamide SuccinyltransferaseDihydrolipoyllysine-residue succinyltransferaseDLSTE. coliHmmsearchModelAngeloMultiple Sequence AlignmentPDBProtein BLASTProtein Data BankProtein PurificationStructure PredictionTCA CycleTricarboxylic Acid CycleWestern Blot

Identifiers

PMID39958810
PMCPMC11830286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.