ArticleJournal of structural biology: X2025
Protein identification using Cryo-EM and artificial intelligence guides improved sample purification.
Article in Journal of structural biology: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breaking barriers: transitioning from X-ray crystallography to cryo-EM for structural studies.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in structural biology: Preface.Structural dynamics (Melville, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Breaking Barriers: Transitioning from X-ray Crystallography to Cryo-EM for Structural Studies of ATAD2B.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Computational design of bifaceted protein nanomaterials.Nature materials · 2025Article
- AlphaFold3: An Overview of Applications and Performance Insights.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Atomically accurate de novo design of antibodies with RFdiffusion.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein purification is essential in protein biochemistry, structural biology, and protein design, enabling the determination of protein structures, the study of biological mechanisms, and the characterization of both natural and de novo designed proteins. However, standard purification strategies often encounter challenges, such as unintended co-purification of contaminants alongside the target protein. This issue is particularly problematic for self-assembling protein nanomaterials, where unexpected geometries may reflect novel assembly states, cross-contamination, or native proteins originating from the expression host. Here, we used an automated structure-to-sequence pipeline to first identify an unknown co-purifying protein found in several purified designed protein samples. By integrating cryo-electron microscopy (Cryo-EM), ModelAngelo's sequence-agnostic model-building, and Protein BLAST, we identified the contaminant as dihydrolipoamide succinyltransferase (DLST). This identification was validated through comparisons with DLST structures in the Protein Data Bank, AlphaFold 3 predictions based on the DLST sequence from our E. coli expression vector, and traditional biochemical methods. The identification informed subsequent modifications to our purification protocol, which successfully excluded DLST from future preparations. To explore the potential broader utility of this approach, we benchmarked four computational methods for DLST identification across varying resolution ranges. This study demonstrates the successful application of a structure-to-sequence protein identification workflow, integrating Cryo-EM, ModelAngelo, Protein BLAST, and AlphaFold 3 predictions, to identify and ultimately help guide the removal of DLST from sample purification efforts. It highlights the potential of combining Cryo-EM with AI-driven tools for accurate protein identification and addressing purification challenges across diverse contexts in protein science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.