Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39958747›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2025

Negative childbirth experience in Dutch women: A socio-ecological analysis of individual, interpersonal, and organisational factors from the birth experience study.

Tamool A S Muhamed, Viola Angelini, Laura Viluma, Hazel Keedle, L Lilian Peters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tamool A S MuhamedUniversity of Groningen, Faculty of Economics and Business, Department of Economics, Econometrics, and Finance, Nettelbosje, 9700, AV, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Viola AngeliniUniversity of Groningen, Faculty of Economics and Business, Department of Economics, Econometrics, and Finance, Nettelbosje, 9700, AV, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Laura VilumaUniversity of Groningen, Faculty of Economics and Business, Department of Economics, Econometrics, and Finance, Nettelbosje, 9700, AV, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Hazel KeedleWestern Sydney University, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Sydney, Australia.
L Lilian PetersUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Primary and Long-term Care, Section Midwifery Science, Hanzeplein 1, 9713, GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Negative childbirth experience detrimentally impacts women's mental well-being, potentially leading to delaying future pregnancies, and an increased likelihood of requesting caesarean births. Aim: To examine differences between women who reported positive and negative childbirth experience and detangle the complexity of negative childbirth experience by building a socio-ecological model that includes individual, interpersonal, and organisational factors. Methods: We conducted the Birth Experience Study Netherlands (BESt-NL) survey in 2022 with two languages versions (Dutch-English), and incorporated validated measures, such as Mothers' autonomy in decision-making, the Mothers On Respect index, and the Nijmegen Continuity of Care questionnaire. We employed socio-ecological modelling of individual (e.g., sociodemographic, ethnicity, parity, adverse mental health, interpersonal (e.g., autonomy in decision-making, respect, partner support), and organisational factors (e.g., place of birth, continuity of care). We defined negative childbirth experience using the valid Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2.0. We applied multivariable logistic regression to examine associations between those factors and negative childbirth experience. Findings: In total, (N = 1141) women were included in the BEST-NL study population, and 25 % of women (N = 285) experienced negative childbirth. Higher percentages were observed for non-Dutch ethnicity, preterm births, pregnancy complications, non-spontaneous births, adverse mental health, obstetrician-led care, and low autonomy, respect, social support, and continuity of care. Upon modelling, significant associations emerged i.e., education; or diminished i.e., place of birth; leaving robust associations in preterm, non-spontaneous birth, and adverse mental health, and inverse associations in high autonomy, respect, social support, and continuity of care. Conclusion: Socio-ecological modelling untangled the complexity of negative childbirth experience. This study recommends fostering efforts toward women with prenatal mental health conditions and migrants, emphasises the importance of high autonomy, respect, and continuity in high-quality intrapartum care, and highlights the positive impact of midwife-led care in reducing negative childbirth experience likelihood.

Indexed as

ChildbirthContinuity of careDecision makingMidwiferyRespectSocio-ecological model

Identifiers

PMID39958747
PMCPMC11825256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.