ArticleFrontiers in nephrology2024
Case report: Novel
Article in Frontiers in nephrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) is a rare kidney disease commonly characterized histopathologically by focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) or minimal change disease. One-third of SRNS-FSGS cases are attributed to a genetic cause ultimately leading to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) during childhood or adulthood. Case–diagnosis/treatment: A 10-year-old Chilean male patient, born to a complicated pregnancy without any history of prenatal care, was incidentally found to have mild proteinuria during pre-surgery analysis. He was diagnosed with nephrotic syndrome and treatment with prednisone was started, but 12 months later, he persisted with hyperlipidemia, hypoalbuminemia, and proteinuria. Within a few weeks, proteinuria rapidly increased, and a kidney biopsy exhibited FSGS features. At the age of 12, he reached ESKD and initiated peritoneal dialysis, experiencing an episode of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. Exome sequencing identified a novel variant of uncertain significance (VUS), Conclusions: Identifying VUS is a recurring challenge in routine clinical genetics, particularly for patients with rare diseases or atypical phenotypes in underrepresented populations. This case underscores the benefit of timely genetic diagnosis taking into account the patient's request. VUS reassessment becomes more relevant when considering a kidney transplant not only as an appropriate procedure, but as the therapy of choice, especially considering the patient's history of complications with variable long-term consequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.