Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39958666›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy international open2025

Pull-through endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure therapy for complicated leaks of the gastrointestinal tract: Novel technique.

Carsten Engelke, Yaser Hatem, Carlos Maaß, Martin Kraus, Michael Thomaschewski, Fabian Jacob, Roman Kloeckner, Malte Maria Sieren, Tobias Keck, Jens U Marquardt and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy international open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Percutaneous endoscopic vacuum therapy for treatment of severe gastric staple line dehiscence after surgical bypass revision.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Carsten EngelkeFirst Department of Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Lübeck Campus, Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5251-1422
Yaser HatemFirst Department of Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Lübeck Campus, Lübeck, Germany.
Carlos MaaßFirst Department of Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Lübeck Campus, Lübeck, Germany.
Martin KrausFirst Department of Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Lübeck Campus, Lübeck, Germany.
Michael ThomaschewskiDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Lübeck Campus, Lübeck, Germany.
Fabian JacobInstitute for Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Lübeck Campus, Lübeck, Germany.
Roman KloecknerInstitute for Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Lübeck Campus, Lübeck, Germany.
Malte Maria SierenInstitute for Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Lübeck Campus, Lübeck, Germany.
Tobias KeckDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Lübeck Campus, Lübeck, Germany.
Jens U MarquardtFirst Department of Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Lübeck Campus, Lübeck, Germany.
Jens HoeppnerDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital OWL of Bielefeld University Campus Hospital Lippe, Detmold, Germany.
Martha Maria KirsteinFirst Department of Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Lübeck Campus, Lübeck, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and study aims: Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure (EVAC) of postsurgical leaks is an increasingly applied technique. Precise intracavitary sponge placement is technically challenging. Here, we describe a novel EVAC therapy using a combined external and endoluminal, pull-through technique. Patients and methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we included all patients treated with pull-through EVAC for post-surgery leaks. During endoscopy, the proximal tip of the percutaneous drainage was visualized within the extraluminal abscess cavity, grasped with forceps, and pulled out orally while maintaining the distal end of the drainage above skin level. A foam sponge was fixed to the tip of the percutaneous drainage and sutured to a gastric tube at the other end. The sponge was placed in the cavity by pulling at the percutaneous drainage. Finally, the gastric probe was channeled nasally and suction was applied. Reinterventions comprised pulling the gastric tube, exchanging the sponge, and re-positioning, as described above. Therapy was stopped after closure or complete epithelialization of the leakage. Results: Overall, seven patients were included between 2021 and 2023. Median duration of pull-through EVAC therapy was 30 days (interquartile range [IQR] 11-37 days) and the median number of endoscopic interventions was six (IQR 4-10). Technical and clinical success was achieved in all (100%) and in six of seven patients (85.7%), respectively. In total, one major bleeding complication associated with EVAC therapy occurred (14.3%). Conclusions: Pull-through EVAC therapy is safe and effective in patients with large and challenging postsurgical leaks of the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Indexed as

Endoscopy Small BowelGI surgeryPerformance and complicationsQuality and logistical aspectsSmall bowel endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID39958666
PMCPMC11827752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.