Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39958661›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy international open2025

Endoscopic closure using a dedicated device following gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: Multicenter, prospective, observational pilot study.

Kazuo Shiotsuki, Kohei Takizawa, Yohei Nose, Yuki Kondo, Hitoshi Homma, Taisuke Inada, Mao Daikaku, Kosuke Maehara, Shin-Ichiro Fukuda, Hironori Aoki and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy international open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Kazuo ShiotsukiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Kohei TakizawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Koyukai Shin-Sapporo Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7702-0427
Yohei NoseGastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1973-9035
Yuki KondoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Hitoshi HommaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Taisuke InadaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center, Kitakyushu, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7659-6195
Mao DaikakuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Kosuke MaeharaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Shin-Ichiro FukudaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Hironori AokiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Koyukai Shin-Sapporo Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0070-4900
Yorinobu SumidaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center, Kitakyushu, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7709-6421
Hirotada AkihoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Jiro WatariDepartment of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Koyukai Shin-Sapporo Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Kiyokazu NakajimaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8635-7585

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and study aims: Development of a simple, optimized closure method for mucosal defects left by gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is warranted. Herein, we developed a novel and dedicated closure device called FLEXLOOP and aimed to assess feasibility and safety of the closure using FLEXLOOP following gastric ESD. Patients and methods: This multicenter, prospective, observational study enrolled patients clinically diagnosed with gastric neoplasms < 30 mm in size. Following gastric ESD, closure of the mucosal defect was performed using a FLEXLOOP with standard clips. The primary outcome was the complete closure rate. The secondary outcomes were procedure time, number of clips, sustained closure rate on second-look endoscopy on postoperative days (PODs) 5 to 7, and rate of post-ESD bleeding. Results: Overall, 35 patients were included in this study. The median specimen size was 32 mm. The mucosal defect was completely closed in 31 patients (89%; 95% confidence interval, 73%-99%) and incompletely closed in four patients (11%). Median closure time was 11 minutes and median number of clips was 10. Second-look endoscopy performed on PODs 5 to 7 demonstrated sustained, partially sustained, and unsustained closures in seven (20%), 22 (63%), and six patients (17%), respectively. Post-ESD bleeding and complications related to FLEXLOOP were not observed. Conclusions: Closure using FLEXLOOP is feasible and safe. Our technique using this new device can be an attractive option for more easily closing mucosal defects. However, further clinical research is warranted to confirm that this technique can prevent delayed complications.

Indexed as

Barrett's and adenocarcinomaEndoscopic resection (ESD, EMRc, ...)Endoscopy Upper GI TractPrecancerous conditions & cancerous lesions (displasia and cancer) stomach

Identifiers

PMID39958661
PMCPMC11827757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.