ArticleEndoscopy international open2025
Improved outcomes of endoscopic treatment for delayed perforation following endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasms.
Article in Endoscopy international open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Endoscopic treatment of gastrointestinal perforations and leaks: Why, when, and how?World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and study aims: Emergency surgery is usually required for patients with delayed perforation after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD); however, cases of successful endoscopic treatment recently have been reported. Here, we elucidated the usefulness of endoscopic intervention for patients with delayed perforation. Patients and methods: Patients who underwent gastric ESD from 2005 to 2022 were assessed for eligibility. Delayed perforation was defined as no intraprocedural perforation after the ESD but subsequent development of peritoneal irritation and free air on computed tomography scan. Participants were divided into early- and late-period groups based on time (October 2015) of implementation of the polyglycolic acid (PGA) sheet and the over-the-scope clip (OTSC) in clinical practice. We evaluated changes in incidence of required surgery. Results: Among the 5,048 patients who underwent gastric ESD, delayed perforation occurred in 28 patients (0.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4%-0.8%). Incidence of delayed perforation did not differ significantly between the early- and late-period groups (0.5% vs. 0.6%). The proportion of patients who underwent surgery was significantly smaller in the late-period group than in the early-period group (54% vs. 13%, odds ratio [OR] 0.14, 95% CI 0.02-0.83; Conclusions: Endoscopic intervention using PGA sheets and OTSC was associated with a low incidence of required surgery for delayed perforation after gastric ESD and is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.